Monday 21 March 2016

Google may scoop up cloud companies Namely, Shopify and a host of apps: Report

Google may scoop up cloud companies Namely, Shopify and a host of apps: Report

As Google readies itself for the next frontier to take over the enterprise, it can’t help but prepare its arsenal in the cloud and app domain. According to reports, the search giant is looking to buy its way into the enterprise with a list of possible acquisitions in the pipeline.
Re/code has reported that Google might scoop up a large number of startups which include Metavine — an automated app services startup; Shopify which is a Canadian e-commerce public company and Namely — a payroll and health benefits services provider startup. The list might also include CallidusCloud and Xactly, adds the report.
However, sources revealed in the report that the approaches are still in its preliminary stages and there have been no formalities done yet. The news site also shared that most of the companies including Google, Shopify, Namely and Metavine declined to comment on the matter while Xactly and Callidus did not return their requests for comment.
Google CEO Sundar Pichai’s inclination towards cloud is no surprise. Late last year, Google hired VMware co-founder and industry veteran Diane Greene to run its cloud business. Along with the hire, Google had bought Greene’s startup bebop Technologies Inc, a development platform that helps build and maintain enterprise applications.
Pichai has made selling cloud storage space to enterprises a growing priority for the company to take on rivals Amazon.com and Microsoft. “Every business in the world is going to run on cloud eventually,” he had said in October last year. Amazon’s cloud business is now its fastest-growing business, while Microsoft is banking on cloud computing to make up for slowing sales of personal computers.
Greene, a Google director for three years, was roped in to lead a new role combining the company’s cloud business including Google for Work, Cloud Platform and Google Apps.

CarDekho parent company Girnar Software has funding from Google Capital

CarDekho parent company Girnar Software bags funding from Google Capital


Girnar Software, the parent company to Indian auto portals CarDekho.com, Gaadi.com and Zigwheels.com, recently received an investment from Google Capital with participation from existing investor Hillhouse Capital.
A major part of the new funding will be used to further bolster technology, R&D and expansion within and outside of India. Having launched its services beyond Indian borders with the launch of CarBay.com in Malaysia, Thailand, Vietnam, Philippines and Indonesia, Girnar Software will be looking to consolidate its presence in India as well as other emerging economies in Asia and the Middle East.
Speaking on the investment, Amit Jain, co-founder and CEO, Girnar Software, commented, “Google Capital is one of most respected growth equity investors in the world, and brings to us the resources and expertise from the one of the most valuable technology companies on the planet. Having them on our shareholder roster encourages us to keep raising the standard of our tech offerings as we create the premier automotive digital destination for the emerging markets.”
Explaining their decision to invest, David Lawee, Partner, Google Capital, said, “We’re very excited to be investing in Girnar Software, the parent company of India’s leading auto portal, CarDekho.com. The team is led by savvy entrepreneurs with a strong product orientation, who have positioned the company perfectly in a rapidly growing market. We hope that through our investment and ongoing support, we’ll help them cement their position in India, as the destination for all car related information and transactions, and grow into new markets regionally and globally.”
The latest investment for Girnar Software follows a $50 million funding round led by Hillhouse Capital, with participation from Sequoia Capital and Tybourne Capital. HDFC Bank, and Ratan Tata, Chairman Emeritus of Tata Sons, have also invested in the company.
The Rainmaker Group (TRMG) acted as the exclusive financial advisor to Girnar Software for this transaction.

Intel mastermind Andy Grove dead at 79

Intel mastermind Andy Grove dead at 79


Andy Grove, the Silicon Valley elder statesman who made Intel into the world’s top chipmaker and helped usher in the personal computer age, died on Tuesday at age 79, Intel said.
The company did not describe the circumstances of his death but Grove, who endured the Nazi occupation of Hungary during World War Two, living under a fake name, and came to the United States to escape the chaos of Soviet rule, had suffered from Parkinson’s.
Grove was Intel’s first hire after it was founded in 1968 and became the practical-minded member of a triumvirate that eventually led “Intel Inside” processors to be used in more than 80 percent of the world’s personal computers.
With his motto “only the paranoid survive,” which became the title of his best-selling management book, Grove championed an innovative environment within Intel that became a blueprint for successful California startups.
Grove, who was named man of the year by Time magazine in 1997, encouraged disagreement and insisted employees be vigilant of disruptions in industry and technology that could be major dangers – or opportunities – for Intel. In doing so, he could be mercurial and demanding with employees who he thought were not doing enough and in 1981 required the staff to work two extra hours a day with no extra pay.
Grove’s overhaul of Intel’s business – switching from digital memory to processors – was an early example of his obsession with detecting major shifts in business and technology and staying flexible enough to move quickly and make the most of them.
“It’s not that you shouldn’t plan but you should not regard your plans to be anything more than a baseline model of what might happen,” Grove said.
While Intel founders Robert Noyce and Gordon Moore proposed much of the chip technology that helped created the semiconductor industry, Grove was the stickler for detail who turned their ideas into actual products. He was responsible for driving growth in Intel’s profits and stock price through the 1980s and 1990s.
NAZIS, COMMUNISTS
Grove, who was Jewish, was born Andras Grof in Budapest in 1936. Nazi Germany occupied Hungary in his youth, and after the Soviets followed, Grove sneaked into Austria in 1956 and then emigrated to the United States, where he learned English and earned a Ph.D. in chemical engineering from the University of California at Berkeley.
Grove went to work in 1963 at Fairchild Semiconductor, where he researched technology that would eventually be used to make microchips. At Fairchild, he also met chip visionaries Noyce and Moore, who left to found Intel in 1968. Grove quickly joined them, running research and manufacturing.
He became Intel’s president in 1979, CEO in 1987 and chairman and CEO in 1997. He gave up his CEO title in 1998 and stayed on as chairman until 2004.
In its early years, Intel focused on making DRAM memory chips. When Japanese competition soared, Grove made the fateful decision to reinvent Intel as a manufacturer of microprocessors – the brains at the center of personal computers and other electronic devices.
As the personal computer industry took off in the 1980s, Intel supplied its processors to IBM and then to Compaq and other manufacturers making “IBM clone” PCs.
Intel’s chips, along with Microsoft’s Windows operating system, quickly became an industry standard in the exploding PC industry, with Grove funneling profits into research and development to create faster and faster processors. Under his stewardship, the Pentium brand and “Intel Inside” logo became widely recognized by consumers.
Intel remains one of the world’s leading semiconductor companies but the PC chipmaker is wrestling to adapt to trends toward smaller gadgets like smartphones and tablets.
Grove also was a champion of keeping manufacturing within the United States, arguing outsourcing the manufacturing of electronics products – like batteries or televisions – meant U.S. companies missed out on gaining experience necessary to make technology breakthroughs.
Intel still makes most of its chips in U.S. plants.
During his time at Intel in the 1990s Grove was treated for prostate cancer and later wrote an influential cover story in Fortune magazine, criticizing the medical establishment’s treatment of the disease as inefficient compared to scientific standards applied in semiconductor research.
In later life, Grove donated tens of millions of dollars for research on Parkinson’s disease, a condition he suffered from. He also regularly criticized government and medical researchers for making slow and inefficient progress beating that disease compared to accomplishments made in the chip industry.
Grove and his wife, Eva, who married a year after meeting while working at a resort in New Hampshire in 1957, had two daughters.

Apple’s 9.7-inch iPad Pro is the ultimate PC replacement? Hah

Apple’s 9.7-inch iPad Pro is the ultimate PC replacement? Hah

Last night during Apple’s event, Phil Schiller, Senior Vice President of World at the technology giant announced that the 9.7-inch is the “ultimate PC Replacement“. Well, to that I’d say, “Rubbish!” Citing the “600 million” PC users still stuck on five year old PCs, Schiller said, “That’s sad.”
I’ve got a five year old PC and it’s running perfectly fine! So, thank you very much. 2011 was the year Intel launched its stellar Sandy Bridge platform and it wouldn’t be much of a stretch to say that there’s been nothing like it since. There’s no way I’d exchange my Intel i5 for an iPad.
But what’s up with Apple? Why the sudden push towards a Pro platform and this talk of the iPad, of all things, as a PC replacement?
Tablet sales have been dwindling these last few years and I think that decline can be attributed to the fact that tablets are no longer the media consumption device of choice. When we’re already doing all we want on the phone, why would we need a tablet?
In its heydays, tablet computers offered a browsing experience that was unfettered by the shackles of the mobile web. Five years ago, developers were still learning how to deal with the mobile browsing experience and concepts such as responsive design were still relatively new. Many websites today still struggle in that department, but they’re a vanishing minority. At the time, cheap laptops were underpowered and bulky, phones too slow and screens too small.
Any kind of media was just better on a tablet, except maybe music, and I remember getting myself my first iPad (the third generation one) just for media consumption. Back then, I was overjoyed with the device. The gorgeous, 9.7-inch retina display (still unmatched by most displays), the pleasure of browsing the “desktop” web on the go and the ability to watch videos without squinting was exactly what I wanted.
Today’s web is very mobile friendly and there’s literally an app for everything. A screen size of 5-inches and above is more than enough for video and phones aren’t really lacking in the power department either. Editing photos or 4K video is as easy on a phone as on a tablet.
It wasn’t long before my iPad started gathering dust and I sold it soon after. A brief stint with an Nvidia Shield and Surface Pro also didn’t do much to convince me of the need for a tablet. If anything, the Surface Pro not only showcased just how good a Windows laptop could be, but also how bad a Windows 10 tablet experience can be.
This is just me of course, but as a person that detests laptops for their fiddlesome touchpad and bulk, I’d love a tablet type device that could replace it. Sadly, there’s nothing in the market to fill that void just yet. The iPad Pro is powerful for what it is, but it can’t beat something like, say, the Surface Pro in terms of sheer power or Windows for flexibility. Android? I just wish it would make up it’s mind with regards to tablets (but maybe Android N  will fix that).
The 9.7-inch iPad Pro is not cheap (Rs 49,900), has “good” speakers, requires a Rs 10,000 keyboard, has a “task-switcher” and can display two windows side-by-side. Oh, and it runs Microsoft Office.
Rs 60,000 will get you a MacBook Pro with a 13-inch screen, an i5 CPU, 500GB HDD and all the power of OS X and you can open as many windows as you’d like. That same Rs 60,000 will get you any number of similarly specced Windows devices. Both of these run Microsoft Office and any number of other, feature-rich and more importantly, productive applications.
In what context is the iPad Pro (12.9-inch or 9.7-inch model) a viable PC replacement?